Pinni B: Minerva, heti rappuset ylös
Päätalo (suoraan ovesta toiseen rakennukseen): Yliopiston ravintola II kerroksessa
Linna: Kalevantien toisella puolen alikulun kautta: Ravintola Linna
Työryhmä kokoontuu klo 13-17 Linna-rakennuksessa, KH 113. (Kalevantie 5). Tila on alakerrassa, opastuksen vierestä oikealla käytävän päässä. (Huom. muuttunut paikka)
Työryhmän aikataulu:
13-13.30 Vesterinen, Kynäslahti, Lipponen & Tella: Towards Volitional Aspects of Media Literacy
13.30-14.00 Korhonen & Rantala: New Literacies and Old Conceptions of Knowledge in School
14.00-14.30 Rantala: Digital Literacies in Third Spaces of the Information Society
14.30-15.00 Coffee break
15.00-15.30 Östman: Significances of Life Publications
15.30-16.00 Hautakangas: The ‘Activated Audience’ of Big Brother Finland
16.00-16.30 Koistinen: Blogit ja kuluttajan rooli
16.30-17.00 Laitinen & Rissanen: Osaatko wikitellä? – Selvityksiä sosiaalisen median käytöstä korkeakoulusektorilla - etänä Kuopiosta
3 kommenttia:
We are looking forward to meeting everyone on Monday. The schedule looks great.
How is it possible to tune in seminar online?
Just to play the devil's advocate here...
A lot of the web 2.0 & social media stuff is about collective creativity & insider meanings like Colin & Michelle showed during the lecture. (The stuff about being an insider was interesting in many ways. A big allure of Lord of the Rings the book is the vast background that Tolkien created. If you are familiar with that background then, for instance, the dialogues in LOTR open up on new levels; maybe not in terms of insider "jokes", but other types of insider "hints".) So one has to become one of the crowd, be socialised in order to participate fully. That's all well and good. But what if someone (like Kierkegaard, for instance) said that this kind of *essentially* collective creativity is a way of "leveling down" individual voices and individual creations? The mob becomes the arbitrator of meaning by "digging" and "tagging" and "linking". This Kierkegaardian question does not necessarily have to be the culturally conservative or elitist worry over "quality" or "creative genius"; it can be turned into an existential worry over what type of individuality prospers or is streamlined for essentially collective work & play. One way of asking the same question would be: what commitments made online would be kept if the net disappeared tomorrow?
Lähetä kommentti